Se rendre au contenu
← Horizons B2 B2
14C Everyday English

Discuss a research finding

Unit 14

  • I CAN discuss implications of a research finding
  • I CAN write a short summary of a study
Discuss a research finding
Everyday English

Everyday English

5 cards

When you discuss a study with colleagues, in class, or in a presentation, you will want to sound careful and academic. Strong speakers do not just say 'the study found X' — they use a small set of phrases that show how confident they are, and how they are interpreting the evidence. The phrases below are the building blocks of academic discussion in English.

Look at the table. Each phrase has a slightly different job. Some report what the researchers found directly; others interpret the meaning; others hedge the claim so it sounds careful. The Arabic gloss beside each phrase will help you remember the work it does.

English phrase عربي
The study found that… أظهرت الدراسة أن…
The research shows that… يُظهر البحث أن…
The findings suggest that… تشير النتائج إلى أن…
This implies that… هذا يعني ضمنًا أن…
What stands out is that… ما يلفت الانتباه هو أن…
It could be argued that… يمكن القول إن…
In other words, … بمعنى آخر، …
The implications are significant. العواقب ذات أهمية كبيرة.

Notice the hedges in the table: suggest, implies, could be argued. These are not signs of weak English. In academic discussion, they show that you are being careful with claims. A single study rarely proves something once and for all; it suggests it, or implies it. Choosing the right hedge is part of being a clear, honest academic speaker.

A second useful pattern is the in-other-words move. When you have just used a technical phrase, you can rephrase it more simply: In other words, students who sleep more do not always do better. This helps your listener follow you and shows that you understand the idea yourself.

You will hear all of these phrases in the dialogue below. As you listen, notice which phrase the speakers choose and what job it does in the conversation.

Generating translation…

Aisha and Ben, two colleagues, discuss a new study on reading and empathy.

  1. A
    Aisha Have you read that new study on reading fiction and empathy?
  2. B
    Ben Not yet. What did it find?
  3. A
    Aisha It found that readers of literary fiction score higher on empathy tests than readers of non-fiction or popular fiction.
  4. B
    Ben Interesting. So what stands out is the type of fiction, not just the amount of reading?
  5. A
    Aisha Exactly. The findings suggest that literary fiction makes readers think more about other people's inner lives.
  6. B
    Ben In other words, the more complex the characters, the more we learn to see other points of view?
Required

Match each phrase to the job it does in academic discussion.

Match each phrase to the job it does in academic discussion.

  • The study found that…
  • The findings suggest that…
  • It could be argued that…
  • In other words, …
  • Reporting a direct result
  • Interpreting what a result means
  • Hedging a claim to sound careful
  • Rephrasing a complex idea more simply
Required

Put the lines of this short discussion in the correct order.

  1. Have you seen the new study on reading and empathy?
  2. Yes, I have. The findings suggest that literary fiction improves empathy.
  3. What stands out about the results?
  4. That the type of fiction seems to matter more than the amount of reading.
Required

Read the sentence aloud, paying attention to the stress on SUGgest and IMpact-style rhythm in the longer noun phrases. Sound calm and academic, not dramatic.

The findings suggest that literary fiction makes readers think more about other people's inner lives.

Listening

Listening

5 cards

Before you listen to a real conversation, it helps to set a scene. Imagine two colleagues at a university — Dr Sarah Chen, a psychology lecturer, and Tom, a learning adviser. They are in the staff room, drinking tea, and Sarah has just read about a new study on sleep and exam performance. She wants Tom's opinion, and she wants to know what the findings might mean for the students they advise.

While you prepare to listen, think about one question: what kind of result would interest a learning adviser? Would it be about memory, concentration, exam technique, or something else? The answer will help you predict the topic before the conversation begins, and good listeners always predict before they hear.

In the dialogue you are about to hear, you will meet many of the academic phrases from the previous section. Listen first for the gist — what is the main finding of the study? Then listen again for the specific numbers and the implications the speakers draw. The final question will ask you to fill in a small detail, so pay attention to exact wording such as percentages, time periods, and recommendation language.

Remember: good listeners do not try to catch every word on the first listen. They listen for meaning first, then go back for numbers and details. This two-pass approach is the way real academic listening works.

Generating translation…

Dr Sarah Chen, a psychology lecturer, talks to Tom, a learning adviser, about a new study on sleep and exam performance.

  1. S
    Sarah Have you seen the new study on sleep and exam results?
  2. T
    Tom No, I haven't. What did it find?
  3. S
    Sarah It found that students who sleep seven to eight hours consistently score about fifteen per cent higher on tests than those who sleep less.
  4. T
    Tom That's interesting, but what about students who sleep more than eight hours?
  5. S
    Sarah The results suggest there's a sweet spot. Beyond nine hours, performance actually starts to drop slightly.
  6. T
    Tom What do you think that means for our students?
  7. S
    Sarah I think we should recommend a regular sleep schedule, not just 'get more sleep'.
  8. T
    Tom So the implication is that consistency matters more than duration?
  9. S
    Sarah Exactly. The researchers say it's the regularity of the sleep pattern that seems to be the key factor.
Required

Listen again. What is the main finding of the study Sarah describes?

  • Sleeping more hours always improves exam results.
  • A regular sleep pattern of around seven to eight hours is linked to better exam results.
  • Students should avoid sleeping more than six hours a night.
Required

According to Sarah, students who sleep more than nine hours perform slightly better than those who sleep seven to eight hours.

Required

Listen once more and complete the sentence. Sarah recommends a regular ___ rather than just telling students to 'get more sleep'.

Pronunciation

Pronunciation

6 cards

English has a useful stress pattern that you will meet again and again in research and academic vocabulary. Many common two-syllable words change their stress depending on whether they are used as a noun or as a verb. As a rough rule, the noun form places stress on the first syllable, while the verb form places stress on the second syllable. The same letters, the same spelling, but a very different rhythm.

To make a syllable stressed, you need to push a little more air out of your lungs, raise the pitch of your voice, and hold the vowel slightly longer. The unstressed syllable becomes shorter, quieter, and is often pronounced with the weak schwa vowel /ə/ — the lazy, neutral 'uh' sound that you hear at the beginning of about and the end of letter. Listen to your own voice when you say the noun RE·search (strong stress on RE-) and the verb re·SEARCH (strong stress on -SEARCH). Your jaw and your pitch both change between the two.

Here are five common pairs to notice. They are all useful when you discuss a research finding.

Noun (stress on 1st) Verb (stress on 2nd)
RE·search re·SEARCH
IM·pact im·PACT
OB·ject ob·JECT
PRE·sent pre·SENT
CON·test con·TEST

Getting the stress right matters. If you say the verb form with first-syllable stress, a native speaker may hear the noun and become slightly confused. In academic talk, where every word carries weight, this small mistake can change the meaning of a sentence. Train your ear to notice the move from noun to verb, and your speech will sound more natural and more accurate.

Generating translation…

When you discuss a study, you will use words like research, impact and object as both nouns and verbs. In English, the noun usually stresses the first syllable, and the verb usually stresses the second. To stress a syllable: push more air, raise your pitch, and hold the vowel slightly longer. The other syllable becomes short and quiet, often sounding like the neutral 'uh' /ə/. Try saying the noun REsearch and the verb reSEARCH now — listen to the difference.

Required
Audio is being generated — try again in a minute.

You hear the word 'research'. Is the speaker using it as a noun or as a verb?

  • As a noun (REsearch)
  • As a verb (reSEARCH)
Required

Say the noun clearly. Push the stress on to the first syllable and let the second syllable be short and quiet.

REsearch

Required

Now say the verb form. Push the stress on to the second syllable. The first syllable should be short and quick.

to reSEARCH

Required

Read the whole sentence aloud. Say IMPACT as a noun, with strong stress on the first syllable.

The findings will IMpact the policy.

Reading

Reading

5 cards

In the listening section you heard two colleagues discuss a study. Now you will read a short report about a different study. Before you read in detail, you need a strategy. You will not always have time to read every word carefully, so you need a quick way to find the main idea first.

Skimming strategy Skimming means reading a text quickly to get the general idea, not every detail. To skim well:

  1. Read the title and any subheadings.
  2. Read the first sentence of each paragraph.
  3. Read the last paragraph or conclusion.
  4. Ignore examples, numbers, and names for now — you can return to them later.

This should take you about thirty to sixty seconds for a short article. After skimming, you should be able to answer the question, What is this text mostly about?

Key words to notice in the article Before you skim, look at these four words. They will appear in the text, and knowing them will help you follow the argument without a dictionary.

  • creative thinking — producing many new, original ideas
  • divergent thinking — generating many possible answers to an open question
  • convergent thinking — narrowing down to a single, correct answer
  • brainstorming — a meeting to generate ideas together

You will meet these four ideas in the reading passage. As you skim, ask yourself: which type of thinking did the study look at, and which did it not? This question will appear in the exercises that follow.

Generating translation…

New Research on Walking and Creative Thinking

A recent study from Stanford University suggests that walking can significantly boost creative thinking. The researchers found that participants who walked, both indoors on a treadmill and outdoors in the open air, produced about 60% more creative ideas than those who sat still. Interestingly, the effect continued even after participants sat down again and continued to work. The findings suggest that the movement itself, not just being in nature, may be responsible for the boost in ideas.

Dr Oppezzo, who led the study, recommends taking a short walk before brainstorming sessions at work. However, the research focused on divergent thinking — the kind of thinking where you generate many possible answers — not on convergent thinking, where you focus on a single correct solution. The researchers are clear that walking helps you come up with ideas, but it may not help you decide which idea is best.

Generating translation…

Required

Read for gist. What is the article mainly about?

  • Why walking in nature is good for general health.
  • A study showing that walking can boost creative thinking.
  • How to run a successful brainstorming session at work.
Required

According to the article, the positive effect of walking stopped as soon as the participants sat down again.

Required

The study looked at both divergent thinking (generating ideas) and convergent thinking (finding a single answer).

Speaking

Speaking

6 cards

When you discuss a research finding, you need to do three things in a balanced way: report what the study found, interpret what it might mean, and evaluate how strong or useful the evidence is. Good academic speakers move smoothly between these three moves, and they sound natural while doing so.

The phrases below will help you in each move. Notice that you can use them in any order, but a clear answer usually starts with the finding, then the interpretation, then the evaluation. The Arabic gloss will help you remember the job of each phrase.

English phrase عربي
The study found that… أظهرت الدراسة أن…
According to the research, … وفقًا للبحث، …
This suggests that… هذا يشير إلى أن…
What this implies is… ما يعنيه هذا هو…
In other words, … بمعنى آخر، …
One limitation is that… من القيود أن…
It would be useful to know… سيكون من المفيد معرفة…
I'm not sure we can generalise from this. لست متأكدًا إن كان بإمكاننا تعميم هذا.

In the model dialogue you are about to hear, two colleagues — Aisha and Ben — discuss a study on reading fiction and empathy. Aisha reports the finding, Ben interprets it, and both evaluate it briefly. Listen for the natural movement from report to interpret to evaluate.

After the model, you will have a chance to read the key phrase aloud, then to have the same conversation yourself with the app. The more natural you sound in the roleplay, the more confident your real-world discussions will become.

Generating translation…

Aisha and Ben discuss a study on reading fiction and empathy, moving from reporting the finding to interpreting it to evaluating its strength.

  1. A
    Aisha What did you think of that study on reading fiction and empathy?
  2. B
    Ben I thought it was interesting. The study found that readers of literary fiction scored higher on empathy tests.
  3. A
    Aisha What does that suggest, in your view?
  4. B
    Ben It suggests that the type of fiction matters, not just the amount of reading. Literary fiction seems to make people think more about other people's inner lives.
  5. A
    Aisha Do you think we can generalise from this?
  6. B
    Ben I'm not sure. One limitation is that the sample was quite small, and it focused on a specific age group.

The findings suggest that literary fiction makes readers think more about other people's inner lives.

This is the key reporting-and-interpreting sentence from the model. It uses the hedge 'suggest', which makes the claim sound careful and academic.

Required

Read the reporting sentence aloud. Use falling intonation at the end to sound factual, not dramatic.

The study found that readers of literary fiction scored higher on empathy tests.

Required

Read the interpreting sentence aloud. Use a slight rise on 'suggests' and fall at the end to sound considered.

This suggests that the type of fiction matters, not just the amount of reading.

Required

In this roleplay, you are Aisha. Ben has just asked you about a study on walking and creative thinking. Report the main finding (a Stanford study found that walking boosts creative thinking by about 60%). Then interpret what it suggests. Then give one limitation (for example, the study only looked at divergent thinking, not convergent thinking). Try to use at least one hedging phrase such as 'suggests' or 'it could be argued'.

Writing

Writing

6 cards

Many workplace and study tasks ask you to write a short summary of a piece of research — for example, a paragraph in a report, a section of an email, or a post on a professional forum. A good summary is short, accurate, and uses careful, hedged language.

Below is a model summary. It is around sixty words, which is a typical length for a short report or message. As you read it, notice how each sentence has a clear job: the first sentence reports the finding, the second gives a number, the third adds detail, and the fourth limits the claim.

A recent Stanford study found that walking significantly boosts creative thinking. Participants who walked produced about 60% more creative ideas than those who sat still. The effect appeared both indoors and outdoors, suggesting that movement itself — not just being in nature — may be responsible. The study focused on generating new ideas rather than on problem-solving tasks.

Using hedging language One of the most important features of academic English is the use of hedges — words that make a claim sound careful rather than absolute. Compare these four sentences:

  • Walking boosts creativity. (very strong, possibly too strong)
  • Walking may boost creativity. (more careful)
  • Walking appears to boost creativity. (even more careful)
  • Walking seems to boost creativity. (a soft, careful claim)

Strong academic writers rarely say proves or is the only reason. They use verbs like suggest, imply, seem to, appear to, and phrases like it could be argued that. The model above uses three hedges: suggesting that, may be, and focused on … rather than. These small words protect the writer from over-claiming, and they make the summary sound professional.

In the exercises that follow, you will check that you can spot these hedges in the model, and you will then write and read aloud your own short summary.

Generating translation…

Academic writing is rarely certain. Strong writers use hedges to make claims sound careful: may, suggests, seems to, appears to, it could be argued that. A hedge is not a sign of weakness — it is a sign that the writer is honest about what the evidence shows. When you write your own summary, try to include at least one hedge in every paragraph.

Required

Which of the following sentences is the most careful, hedged claim?

  • Walking boosts creativity.
  • Walking may boost creativity.
  • Walking is the only way to boost creativity.
Required

In the model summary, the writer uses the word 'proves' to describe the study's finding.

Required

Write a short summary of any research finding you find interesting — it can be a real study or one you invent. Use at least two hedging words (for example: suggests, may, seems to, appears to, it could be argued that). When you finish, read your summary aloud clearly. Aim for 40-60 words in total.

Now write your own short summary of a study in 40-60 words. When you finish, read it aloud.

Required