Welcome to the end-of-unit review. Over the last few lessons you have looked at three important areas of English: future forms, modals of obligation and interview language. This section brings them together so you can check what you remember and use them confidently in your own writing.
Future forms at a glance
English has several ways to talk about the future. The choice depends on how certain the speaker feels and whether the action is planned, decided, or predicted.
| Form |
Use |
Example |
| will |
spontaneous decisions, predictions based on opinion |
I think it will rain later. |
| going to |
plans and intentions, predictions based on evidence |
Look at those clouds — it's going to rain. |
| present continuous |
fixed arrangements |
I'm meeting my manager at three. |
| future perfect |
action finished before a future time |
By Friday, I will have finished the report. |
| future continuous |
action in progress at a future time |
This time tomorrow I will be flying to London. |
A common mistake is to mix will and going to in the same idea. Will reacts to the moment of speaking, while going to describes something decided before the moment. The future perfect and future continuous add precision: one tells you what will already be finished, the other what will be in progress at a specific future time.
Modals of obligation and advice
Modals let us say how necessary, permitted or recommended something is. Here are the main ones from the unit.
| Modal |
Meaning |
Example |
| must |
strong personal obligation |
I must submit my CV tonight. |
| have to |
external obligation |
She has to wear a uniform at work. |
| need to |
necessary action |
You need to bring two forms of ID. |
| should |
mild advice or expectation |
You should arrive ten minutes early. |
| ought to |
similar to should, more formal |
Applicants ought to research the company first. |
| had better |
strong warning or advice |
You'd better reply to that email today. |
| mustn't |
prohibition |
You mustn't use your phone in the interview. |
| don't have to / don't need to |
absence of obligation |
You don't have to wear a tie. |
Watch the difference between must not (it is forbidden) and don't have to (it is not necessary). They are opposites, not the same. Should and ought to are similar, but ought to sounds more formal and is common in written advice, while had better is a stronger warning, often about a single urgent action.
Interview language
A job interview is a formal situation, so the language is more careful than everyday speech. You will often hear and need to produce:
- Opening phrases: Thank you for having me. / It's a pleasure to be here.
- Talking about experience: I have been working in… / I spent three years as a…
- Talking about skills: I am confident in… / I have strong communication skills.
- Hedging language: I would say… / I tend to… / In my experience…
- Asking questions: Could you tell me…? / Would it be possible to…?
- Closing phrases: Thank you for your time. / I look forward to hearing from you.
Hedging is especially important at B2. Instead of saying I am the best candidate, a stronger answer softens the claim: I would say I am one of the most organised people in my team. Hedging shows confidence without sounding arrogant, and it is a key feature of formal spoken English.
Writing task: an article on interview success
For the writing task, you will write a short article (around 180–220 words) entitled "Five things I wish I had known before my first interview." Use the three areas from the unit:
- future forms to talk about plans after the interview
- modals of obligation to give advice to the reader
- interview language to discuss real interview situations
Using paragraphs and a clear title — a good article is split into an introduction, a body with one idea per paragraph, and a short conclusion. Each new paragraph signals a new tip to the reader, and the title tells the reader what to expect before they read the first line.